Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Our National Cancer Information Specialists are available to help you with any patient services, resource requests, or cancer information questions twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, at 1-800-227-2345. Seiler A, Klaas V, Trster G, Fagundes CP. Kroenke K, Theobald D, Wu J, Norton K, Morrison G, Carpenter J, Tu W. Effect of telecare management on pain and depression in patients with cancer: a randomized trial. For illness-work, the key needs idenitified were; understanding their illness and treatment options, knowing what to expect, communication with healthcare professionals, and staying well. As the cancer population continues to grow, there is an urgent need to improve supportive care services [2]. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. Recently, a shared follow-up approach between primary and secondary providers has been promoted to successfully meet increasing demands for survivorship care [6,7], as innovative methods for long-term cancer care are constantly needed [2]. Digital health interventions are helpful and effective for supportive care of patients with cancer. Synthesis of results was carried out using the Corbin & Strauss "3 lines of work" framework. 2001;10(1):1928. This review compiles evidence regarding the potential of digital health interventions for supportive cancer care in different settings, including remote areas and emergency situations [33]. The site is secure. Applications of research findings in other chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease [70], hypertension [12], and diabetes [71], which have a larger evidence base in digital healthenabled interventions with positive effects, should be used where possible. Only 2 publications referred to the CONSORT Digital Health Checklist [46,55]. Lisy K, Kent J, Piper A, Jefford M. Facilitators and barriers to shared primary and specialist cancer care: a systematic review. Sikorskii A, Given CW, Given B, Jeon S, Decker V, Decker D, Champion V, McCorkle R. Symptom management for cancer patients: a trial comparing two multimodal interventions. 25, Issue. Australia, 4 Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). Srivastava S, Pant M, Abraham A, Agrawal N. The technological growth in eHealth services. 2022;19(17):10787. Duration first review round. European Journal of Cancer Care, 22 (4), 530 . The most common outcome measure reported was clustered symptom changes, as referenced in 6 studies [45,46,49,54,55,60]. The importance of supportive care for patients with cancer. nCEIBISMS: combined exercise intervention based on internet and social media software. Supportive digital interventions in the field of cancer are being used and have been reported to be helpful for patients, independent of other factors. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ehealth interventions in somatic diseases: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Would you like email updates of new search results? No differences between live delivery and telemedicine delivery of therapy. Moreover, only 2 of the included publications referenced the CONSORT Digital Health Checklist, which was published in 2011. These characteristics have been found to contribute to a lack of evidence regarding the benefits of digital health [19]. Bethesda, MD 20894, Web Policies Qual Life Res. Gopal DP, Ahmad T, Efstathiou N, Guo P, Taylor SJC. The .gov means its official. Supportive Care in Cancer is a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal covering research on cancer care. Centre for Epidemiological Cancer Behavior Inventory Studies-Depression Scale 15 d. Decreased distress on one subscale of MSAS. For biographical work, patients commonly struggled with the emotion impact of illness and a lack of control over their lives. See this image and copyright information in PMC, Kashyap D, Pal D, Sharma R, Garg VK, Goel N, Koundal D, Zaguia A, Koundal S, Belay A. All rights reserved worldwide. Use of technology as an adjunct to improve health outcomes for survivors of cancer. Sydney, There is an urgent need to agree on relevant outcomes, methods of assessment, and there is a need for improved quality of primary studies and RCTs, as shown by our quality assessment. A total of 20 studies were conducted across 8 countries [41-48], with 11 from the United States. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the McGuire S. World Cancer Report 2014. Palliative care is provided by a team of doctors, nurses, and other specialists who work with a patient's other doctors to provide an extra layer of support. Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 8600 Rockville Pike After joining this password . Future endeavors could focus on the use of valid, standardized outcome measures, maintenance of methodological rigor, and strategies to improve patient and health professional engagement in the design and delivery of supportive digital health interventions. Kuijpers W, Groen WG, Aaronson NK, van Harten WH. A search was performed in August 2020, using the following web-based databases: MEDLINE (OvidSP, Wolters Kluwer), PubMed (National Center for Biotechnology Information, US National Library of Medicine), Embase (OvidSP, Wolters Kluwer), PsycINFO (American Psychological Association), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (John Wiley & Sons), and Scopus (SciVerse, Elsevier). Palliative care is appropriate at any age and at any stage in a serious illness, and can be provided together . Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Digital health interventions, with telemedicine as its oldest form dating back to the 1920s, have been increasing dramatically in recent years [9]. Online support groups take place using a password-protected message board format (not live chat) and are led by professional oncology social workers who offer support and guidance. Supportive care refers to care aimed at improving the QoL of patients experiencing life-threatening diseases. The Supportive Care Needs of Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review Cancer, and the complex nature of treatment, has a profound impact on lives of patients and their families. Although the review was a rigorous evaluation of RCTs, there were a small number of included studies that indicated there may be significant literature in the phase I or II feasibility spectrum. The RoB for each domain was rated as some concerns, low, or high. government site. Breast cancer survivorship, quality of life, and late toxicities. wLynch [52] and Vallance [53] are 2 publications with different outcomes of the same randomized controlled trial. Therefore, it is possible that research papers published in other parts of the world were missed. 2022;30(5):37333744. Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. Uni-disciplinary interactions dominated, with 5 nurse-led [45,48,50,56,60], 1 social worker-led [49], and 1 led with a medical specialist experienced in mindfulness program delivery [42]. According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2013 impact factor of 2.495. However, guidance from health care workers (HCWs) is not always provided. Substantial heterogeneity in study populations and assessment tools was observed. Supportive care focuses on assisting people with cancer and their families to cope with the disease and its treatment [3]. Methodological quality was independently appraised following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools. Australia, 5 Issue Information - 2023 - CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians - Wiley Population and intervention characteristics. The remaining 8 studies included several tumor types, such as participants living with any type or stage of cancer [42,56-58] or those with solid tumors attending ambulatory oncology clinics for chemotherapy [59,60]. The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. The impact of telehealth remote patient monitoring on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Local Mailing Addresses. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23448. Anticipating the "Silver Tsunami": prevalence trajectories and comorbidity burden among older cancer survivors in the United States. Before Crossref. Google Scholar. Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors. Olver IN. Roberts AL, Fisher A, Smith L, Heinrich M, Potts HW. The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer defines supportive care as 'the prevention and management of the adverse effects of cancer and its treatment'. Diaz A, McErlane J, Jeon MH, Cunningham J, Sullivan V, Garvey G. JCO Glob Oncol. Several successful digital health interventions focus on both behavior change and increasing patient engagement [74,75]. In the studies integrated in this review, the interventions included digital health education, psychotherapy, nursing support, remote exercise, rehabilitation program delivery, and digital mindfulness interventions. Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Two of the suggested strategies to enable supportive cancer care during COVID-19 are (1) empowering patients and caregivers through the use of digital communication and (2) increasing the use of existing digital health platforms . In most studies, digital intervention resulted in significant positive outcomes in patient-reported symptoms, levels of fatigue and pain, health-related quality of life, functional capacity, and depression levels compared with the control. To improve care, these needs should be prioritised by healthcare practitioners. Bethesda, MD 20894, Web Policies Lynch BM, Nguyen NH, Moore MM, Reeves MM, Rosenberg DE, Boyle T, Vallance JK, Milton S, Friedenreich CM, English DR. A randomized controlled trial of a wearable technology-based intervention for increasing moderate to vigorous physical activity and reducing sedentary behavior in breast cancer survivors: the ACTIVATE Trial. Mehnert A. No group effect on overall quality of life; however, there was a time effect. Between-group difference in MVPA at T2 (69 min/week; 95% CI 22 to 116); decreased total time of sitting 37 min/day (95% CI 72 to 2) and prolonged bouts of sitting 42 min/day (95% CI 83 to 2), favoring the intervention group. For example, in the case of diabetes, Greenwood et al [71] found that the most effective digital interventions incorporated all components of a technology-assisted self-management feedback loop, connected people with diabetes and their health care team using two-way communication, analyzed patient-generated health data, tailored education programs, and individualized feedback. Supportive Care in Cancer - SciRev Molecular & Cellular Pathology. The site is secure. Other Title (s): SUPPORT CARE CANCER Publication Start Year: 1993 Frequency: Twelve no. -, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. Supportive Care in Cancer Volumes and issues Volume 30, issue 1 Search within journal Volume 30, issue 1, January 2022 100 articles in this issue Letter to the editor referencing "Body composition changes in patients with head and neck cancer under active treatment: a scoping review" Jon Cacicedo Nere Mendizabal Maria Soledad Arietaleanizbeaskoa Within groups: intervention group, increase in fatigue at T2 5.1 (95% CI 2.0 to 8.2) and at T-3 3.3 (95% CI 0.1 to 6.41). However, data on how these variables affect posttraumatic growth (PTG) are lacking. Beyond treatment - psychosocial and behavioural issues in cancer survivorship research and practice. Supportive Care in Cancer | Volume 31, issue 6 - Springer Wang K, Ma C, Li FM, Truong A, Shariff-Marco S, Chu JN, Oh DL, Allen L, Kuo MC, Wong C, Bui H, Chen J, Gomez SL, Nguyen TT, Tsoh JY. Quality of life in long-term cancer survivors. Dickinson R, Hall S, Sinclair JE, Bond C, Murchie P. Using technology to deliver cancer follow-up: a systematic review. WebChoice lower symptom distress (0.16, 95% CI .25 to 0.06; Internet-based communication group lower depression (0.69, 95% CI 1.32 to 0.05; The positive and negative affect schedule, Clinically changes in fatigue severity in 66% (41/62) of patients in home-based physiotherapist guided protocol (AAF. Supportive Care in Cancer Journal updates Journal updates Open for submission: Cancer-related Pain This series on Cancer-related Pain focuses on the different aspects regarding education, ethics, genetics, prognosis, assessment, and management of the numerous forms of cancer pain. Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Spicer J, Chamberlain C, Papa S. Provision of cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies in English describing a randomized controlled trial (RCT), published between January 2000 and August 2020; (2) intervention recipients were adults with a diagnosis of cancer; (3) involved clinician-led digital health interventions; and (4) interventions implemented to provide supportive cancer care. Western Sydney University, Care Cancer. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13541. Vallance JK, Nguyen NH, Moore MM, Reeves MM, Rosenberg DE, Boyle T, Milton S, Friedenreich CM, English DR, Lynch BM. Online ahead of print. Bookshelf Patient navigation (PN) has many definitions, and, in this, review PN was defined according to the definition of Wells et al. 2018 Dec;69(6):1260-1273. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.08.028. Methods We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study . Support. Ohio | American Cancer Society HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help The site is secure. O'Connor S, Hanlon P, O'Donnell CA, Garcia S, Glanville J, Mair FS. Keywords: Steel JL, Geller DA, Kim KH, Butterfield LH, Spring M, Grady J, Sun W, Marsh W, Antoni M, Dew MA, Helgeson V, Schulz R, Tsung A. Web-based collaborative care intervention to manage cancer-related symptoms in the palliative care setting. Brsund E, Cvancarova M, Moore SM, Ekstedt M, Ruland CM. Evidence from the research and implementation of digital health interventions across other disease groups may facilitate the transferability of digitally enabled supportive cancer care. Of the 20 included studies, 12 (60%) were designed for participants within a single tumor stream. Digital supportive cancer care has been implemented out of necessity and is becoming a common delivery model [77]. Supportive and palliative care in people with cirrhosis: International systematic review of the perspective of patients, family members and health professionals. As with many studies in oncology, this review found that breast cancer survivorship dominated. Submission-related enquiries A matrix was developed by the authors and applied in the collection and analysis of structured data. However, many studies do not address the validity of patient-reported health outcomes, and most of them use self-reported measures in pre-post test design, which leaves them at a RoB. Rooij TV, Marsh S. eHealth: past and future perspectives. The study by OConnor et al [66] recommends increasing public awareness of different technologies and understanding of how they work, personalization of care, clinical accreditation of interventions, improving focus on health literacy, and safeguarding privacy of personal information as key areas for investigation. This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience. PS: Physical/symptom; PE: Psychosocial/emotional; FCR: Fear of cancer recurrence/ spreading; FS: Family support; MS: Medical support; SS: Social support; Fns: Financial support; Sex: sexual/intimacy; Cop: Coping/survival; Act: Daily activity; SP: Spiritual support; Inf: Information support; MC: Medical counseling; PC: Peers communication; Cog: Cognitive needs; Dig: Dignity. Read more The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". Bruggeman-Everts FZ, Wolvers MD, van de Schoot R, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Van der Lee ML. Many studies focus on the needs of specific patient groups, defined by diagnosis, treatment or demographics, but there is no broad consensus on how common or dissimilar patients' supportive care needs are across types of cancer and populations. Social support (74%), daily activity (54%), sexual/intimacy (52%), fear of cancer recurrence/ spreading (50%), and information support (45%) were the top unmet supportive care needs. n/a. Home - MASCC Interacting for health: Using digital technologies to enable health communication among practitioners and between health professionals and clients or patients, for example, traditionally dominated by teleconferencing and videoconferencing, this domain increasingly includes a range of synchronous and asynchronous tools, such as SMS and push notifications from mobile apps, dedicated portals, social media platforms, and virtual or simulated therapy tools. Epub 2022 Aug 30. Bruggeman-Everts et al [41] involved a psychologist or physiotherapist assigned to participants in different arms of the study. Careers. Cancer survivors have been found to have a positive attitude toward digital health [21], suggesting that digital health interventions have the potential to overcome common challenges associated with access to supportive care in this population. Two of the suggested strategies to enable supportive cancer care during COVID-19 are (1) empowering patients and caregivers through the use of digital communication and (2) increasing the use of existing digital health platforms [28]. Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women worldwide. Supportive Care in Cancer Volumes and issues Volume 31, issue 6 Search within journal Volume 31, issue 6, June 2023 56 articles in this issue Correction to: Direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Shuyi Wu Meina Lv Jinhua Zhang Correction Published: 03 June 2023 Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error, Illustration of how the different domains of need identified fit into Corbin and Strauss 3 lines of work model of managing chronic illness. A single study reported a significant improvement in social well-being in the intervention group [49]. Supportive Care Needs of Patients With Lung Cancer in Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Study ZHANG, Tian 1,6; HE, Hongye 1,6; LIU, Qunhui 2; LV, Xiaoqing 3; SONG, Yongxia 4; HONG, Jingfang 5 Author Information Journal of Nursing Research: December 2019 - Volume 27 - Issue 6 - p e52 doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000338 Open Metrics Abstract Results were reported according to the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. PRISMA flow diagram of the paper identification process, Illustration of how the different domains of need identified fit into Corbin and, MeSH Improving access to supportive cancer care through an eHealth application: a qualitative needs assessment among cancer survivors. It is difficult to draw conclusions and synthesize studies with inconsistent outcome measures, and a systematic approach to using standardized measures is required. RCT: randomized controlled trial. 2022 Aug 17:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01246-4. The determination of digital health interventions was on the basis of the conceptual model of Shaw et al [13], which consists of 3 core domains: To be included in the review, it was essential that the intervention satisfied the 2 domains health in our hands and interacting for health. Copyright 2023 Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC). Bickel EA, Schellekens MPJ, Smink JG, Mul VEM, Ranchor AV, Fleer J, Schroevers MJ. This insight has been recurrent in different systematic reviews [32,74]. This work was part-funded by the MacMillan Cancer Support Research Grant number 6488115. 2023 Mar 24:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03401-5. qFACT-Sp: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being. Finally, functional capacity-related outcomes were significant in 3 studies [43,52,58]. Front Oncol. Matrix criteria also included whether a study adhered to the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) eHealth Checklist [40], a tool developed to improve the standard of reporting in digital health trials. Another recent review focused on mobile health apps for chronic disease management and found that regular symptom assessments, automated reminders, and feedback loops were common features, with most studies reporting significant improvement in health outcomes [73]. Accessibility Complementary and alternative medicine in oncology - Springer FOIA 1 Australia, 3 Received 2020 Oct 2; Revisions requested 2020 Oct 30; Revised 2020 Nov 1; Accepted 2021 Sep 20. Cancer; Holistic; Patient needs; Supportive care. Supportive care interventions vary and may involve multidisciplinary team support, including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and allied health professionals [5]. The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The USCNs was found to be significantly associated with demographic factors, disease factors, and psychological factors. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram of the search and study selection process. Thus, the development of supportive care interventions across other tumor streams is required. Control or reduction of symptoms and maintenance of function and independence comprise this domain. Xingcai Zhang, PhD. Of those targeting multiple tumor types, 1 recruited participants with breast or prostate cancer [45], and 1 recruited participants with lung, breast, or colorectal cancer [44]. Leykin Y, Thekdi SM, Shumay DM, Muoz RF, Riba M, Dunn LB. The University of Alabama School of Medicine. The most common outcome in this domain reporting significant improvements in the 4 interventions was depression [46,49,56,57]. Despite progression in pain management, pain is still underreported and undertreated, and there is limited information on the related needs that patients and caregivers may have. SouthGeorgiaandtheSouthSandwichIslands. Supportive Care in Cancer - Wikipedia See theInstructions for Authors for more information. The duration of interventions ranged from 4 weeks to 12 months, with a variable frequency of clinician-patient interactions ranging from biweekly to every 3 months. The initial search generated 972 records. A systematic search of the literature from PsycInfo, Embase and Medline databases was conducted, and a narrative. Australia, 2 The terms digital health and eHealth are frequently used interchangeably, with numerous varied definitions. Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features. HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help "Supportive care" is also the name of multiple textbooks, such as Cancer Supportive Care and Supportive Care . The value of theory for enhancing and understanding e-health interventions. Badger et al [49] was also the only study that evaluated spiritual well-being changes, resulting in statistically significant improvements for the intervention group but no between-group differences. Key areas for digital supportive care design and implementation noted in previous cancer-related reviews that should be further explored are mechanisms for participant feedback to drive the co-design of digital interventions [20,67], the efficiency of delivering relevant and tailored health care information [65], and ways to integrate supportive care services at all stages of the cancer treatment pathway [35]. Interventions for breast cancer were dominant, with a total of 9 studies [43,46-53].